Skip to main content
This course is archived
Course date
July 8–26, 2002
Location
Budapest
Application deadline
Course delivery
In-person

The purpose of this course is threefold. First, it will assess the claim of Western modernist aesthetics to universal currency in terms of an alternative modernist tradition in Central Eastern Europe. Second, it will raise the issue of gaining/losing regional identity in both art and art theory in the recent past (due to communism) and in the present (due to European unification and globalization). Third, it will familiarize the participants with the recent theoretical developments in Western visual culture studies, postcolonial studies, and feminist theory. The course will have an international and comparative perspective.

Course Level and Target Audience

This course is designed for those with prior knowledge of the history of art. Preference will be given to faculty members of institutions of higher learning and researchers with professional experience in art history and theory, art education, art criticism, aesthetics, museum studies, and cultural studies. The course will offer an advanced analysis of the proposed topics.

Syllabus

This course, a sequel to "History and Theory of Art after the Cultural Turn" (2001 CEU SUN), will examine the status of art-historical knowledge about the recent theoretical developments in the humanities and the social sciences. It will be structured thematically.

Steven Mansbach's segment "Methodological Myths in Modernist Culture" will examine the most deeply embedded assumptions regarding the history, practices, and meanings of modern art. Among the principal issues to be analyzed are the following: the claim of Western modernist aesthetics to universal currency, its assertion of an essential connection between visual arts and social reconstruction, and its belief in a revolutionary unfolding of history through visual culture. These claims will be assessed in terms of an alternative modernist tradition in Eastern Europe in which the roles of style, the function of social programs, and the interpretations of history were configured differently from those in the West. By charting the conflicting courses, diverse functions, and defining roles of local traditions within the genesis and function of Eastern European modernism, the richness and complexity of modernism universally might be reclaimed and revived. Although the discussions will focus on the classical modern art and architecture of both Western and Eastern Europe during the first third of the twentieth century, the implications of the investigation into the methodological structures on which modernism is based will likely affect our appreciation of contemporary culture as well.

Piotr Piotrowski’s segment "Art around the Wall: Central-Eastern Europe between the Past and the Future" deals with the art of the second half of the twentieth century and the contemporary art scene in Central Eastern Europe. It considers art production not as an autonomous activity but rather as the complex issue of the political and social context produced by both a "shadow" of the Wall (still dividing the West and the East) and the process of globalization. The course focuses on the political/historical mechanisms that have constructed the regional cultural identity, as well as on the mechanism responsible for the vanishing of Central European identity after the fall of communism.

Edit András in "Art and Art Theory after the Wall: Difficulties of Tradition in Eastern-Central Europe at the End of the 20th Century" argues that the modernist paradigm endorsing such notions as utopianism, formalist aesthetic values, the artist as an autonomous entity, and the transcendent character of art, has outlived itself. This segment will explore the difficulties of the cultural transition following the political one. It will examine the relationship between current Western theoretical discourse and Eastern art-critical practice, and the remnants of the mental 'walls' tending to impede the teaching of the new critical theories. It will scrutinize the widely held view in the region that the new theory, along with all its assumptions, is a domestic affair of the West, and thus is of no concern to Eastern Europe. Case studies and 'close readings' of the regional art informed by the new critical and feminist theory will be offered.

In the last decade, visual culture has emerged, first as a descriptive term and now as an interdisciplinary practice, in the study of visual media in the West. Nicholas Mirzoeff argues that one of the key components of visual culture is globalization in its various forms whether in terms of global visual infrastructures such as cable and satellite global TV channels and programs or the World Wide Web. Rather than using the cultural studies metaphor of culture as text, visual culture studies culture as images, or more precisely, as visualizations. It analyzes visual events in which the consumer interfaces with visual technology. This segment will explore the hypervisibility of everyday life that is everywhere around us.

Margaret Dikovitskaya will provide an overview of visual culture's theoretical frameworks and of postcolonial theories. 'Postcolonial' refers both to the historical period that marks political autonomy (but not economic and cultural autonomy) in former colonies of the West and to a research paradigm that attempts to explore the (neo-colonial map. As a research paradigm, postcolonial studies share commonalities with cultural studies, postmodern theories, and feminist theory. The differences between postcolonial and post-Soviet studies will be addressed.

New perspectives on 'race' and ethnicity in the visual arts have arisen over the last two decades as a result of critical practices among contemporary artists and new paradigms on cultural differences and identity among critics and scholars. Kobena Mercer’s segment "Examining 'Race' and Ethnicity in 20th Century Art" provides an introduction to the key artists and debates of the English-speaking Black Diaspora in the African American and Black British contexts. Providing the student with access to the critical vocabularies of postcolonial theory, the course examines key moments in modern art history by way of detailed case studies that will reveal aspects of cross-cultural dialogue in visual culture hitherto obscured by politics and ideology.

Hilary Robinson’s segmenTeaching Methodst, "The FeTeaching Methodsminist Problematic in Art and Art Writing: Interventions," will explore the intersection of feminist theory and activism with art and art history. It will be grounded in the premise that feminism is not an academic theory or methodology, nor is it a style of art. Instead, feminism will be presented as a rich and diverse set of political and social discourses, able to make strategic interventions in all areas of culture. Following the initial discussion of what is at stake in the encounter between feminism and visual art, and some of the different positions and strategies found in feminist interventions with the art world, the course will attend to some of the major issues: the critiques of art writing; negotiating the intersection between nation and gender; and the issues at stake in representing the body.

Teaching Methods

Daily seminars will be supplemented by lectures and a film screening. Each day a set of readings dealing with a particular topic will be assigned; participants are expected to be familiar with the readings and to be prepared to discuss them. Critidescriptionques and discussions should act as major motivators for the participants, unlike the situation of the traditional lecture format. Participants are asked to submit by the end of the third week a short literature review (approx. 5 double-spaced pages). Please develop one research question that is useful for your studies/research and select three texts from the course readers or from the texts put on library reserve. When writing the literature review bear the following components of a literature review in mind:

  • description (summarize all three texts without making any value judgments);
  • comparison and contrast (e.g., highlight the particular perspectives of each author) concerning your research question;
  • analysis (strengths and weaknesses of each perspective);
  • critical reflection (discuss the usefulness of the texts for your research/studies).

Completed CEU Summer University Application Form

We strongly advise the use of Google Chrome to enable the full functionality of the form.

Notes:

  • You may apply to a maximum of two summer courses. In case of being admitted, you can only attend both if the two courses do not overlap in time.
  • If you applied to CEU before, please use your existing login and password to start a new application. If you do not remember your password from last year click on Forgotten Password. With technical problems, bugs, or errors related to the online application forms please contact the CEU IT Help Desk.
  • Right after login, please select the ”Summer University” radio button from the "Type of course" list, and leave all other fields empty.
  • All application materials must be submitted with the online application form(s). Materials sent by postal mail, electronic mail, or fax are not considered.
  • The maximum allowable file size for upload is 2MB per file and the acceptable file formats are PDF, JPG, and JPEG. Ensure all security features (e.g. passwords and encryption) are removed from the documents before uploading them.
  • Applications cannot be edited after submission. Please submit your application only when it is 100% final and complete.
  • Further user instructions for the online application are included in the form itself. Should you have questions regarding the application form, check the relevant Frequently Asked Questions.
  • Applications submitted after the deadline will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

Inquiries

If you need help or more information during the application process, please feel free to contact the SUN staff via email.

Notification

The SUN Office will notify applicants about the selection results in April. Please check the 'Dates and deadlines' section on the relevant course websites for notification deadlines planned earlier or later. The final decision is not open to appeal.